5 years back Responsive vs Adaptive Web Design was not a big question. Social Media Marketing came into the spotlight recently. Practically everybody develops a website as per SEO and Social media. It was earlier bouncing into the temporary fad. Some said Search Engine Optimization is dead and now it’s the period of Social Media alone.

All things considered, we all know the reality. Social Media Marketing has grown very well. There is a significant content expansion step by step. With respect to SEO, it just got promoted to higher ranks.

Entrepreneurs and web-engineers have become smart today. They understand that over 70% of their movement originates from mobile gadgets. Therefore, the battle is between Responsive Web Design (RWD) and Adaptive Web Design (AWD).

Responsive vs Adaptive Web Design

RWD and AWD are comparable in the way that they change their appearance in light of the width of the program. RWD pushes ahead of AWD. The program requires a resize. AWD is a snap set up demonstrate (measurements in pixels).

Responsive design uses a solitary design overall screens. While Adaptive Design may require up to 6 designs. The distinctive desktop and mobile sizes can be as follows – 320, 480, 760, 960, 1200 and 1600. Therefore, One has to do mobile app development separately in adaptive design. Furthermore, it has its own particular pros and cons. The responsive designs may not exhibit advertisement on pages well. The promotion canvas won’t be responsive in all cases. However, one can tackle this issue with an adaptive design. Each web page has a unique streamline for that specific screen.

What’s more to this? Without question expectations of work on various websites in AWD are high. In contrast, RWD is a more solitary design. This complements AWD. It passes a major opportunity for the “center class” of tablets and netbooks.

How does it affect SEO?

The contention’s picking up footing and will keep on being battled about, for quite a while. Responsive Web Design would win in regards to SEO and Ranking Factor for Google.

Here’s the reason.

Search Engines, particularly our most loved here is Google). They don’t rank indistinguishable content over numerous websites. This is awful for Adaptive Design. However, it utilizes a similar URL structure. It creates an alternate HTML source for the fitting gadget.

Tablets have their own particular class. Therefore, Google does not accept it under Mobile gadgets. AWD passes up a major opportunity for designs for the “Tablet and Netbook Community. Adaptive Design again turns into a major no-no from Google in reasonableness.

Google leans towards Responsive.

This would come as the last in the box. Google has a different view of Responsive Web Design, IT makes it the prescribed design.

Be that as it may, well, Many head websites transition to AWD. Amazon, USA Today and Apple demonstrate that the decision cannot be settled forever. There is a considerable measure of traps up the sleeve for Adaptive Web Design in days to come. In any case, until at that point, Responsive Design brings home the trophy.

We hope you got a better idea of Responsive vs Adaptive Web Design through our blog. Subscribe to our newsletter for other blogs. Put your email address in the space below.

Launch Your Dream Now!!

Join the force of 1,000+ satisfied Narola Client Globally!!!

Looking for a Dream Job? Apply Now





    Awards & Membership

    As the world's leading web & mobile app development company have been privileged to win 10+ numerous awards for our working process. We’re honored to be a recipient of each of these awards for our hard work & customers loyalty.